Claim 1 [preamble]
A computer-implemented method for content moderation comprising:Claim 1.1
receiving, by one or more processors, a content item submitted to an online platform;Claim 1.2
extracting, by the one or more processors, a plurality of features from the content item using a trained machine learning model;Claim 1.3
generating, by the one or more processors, a classification score based on the extracted features;Claim 1.4
comparing the classification score to a predetermined threshold value;Claim 1.5
in response to the classification score exceeding the threshold, automatically flagging the content item for review.Claim 2
The method of claim 1, wherein the trained machine learning model comprises a convolutional neural network.Claim 3
The method of claim 1, wherein extracting the plurality of features comprises identifying semantic embeddings.Claim 4
The method of claim 1, further comprising storing flagged content items in a review queue database.Claim 5
The method of claim 1, wherein the predetermined threshold is dynamically adjusted based on historical accuracy metrics.Evidence: Source Code Analysis
ContentModerationService.java, lines 142-156: processSubmission() method receives content via API endpoint and initiates classification pipeline.Evidence: Technical Documentation
Architecture Doc v2.3, Section 4.1: "The feature extraction module utilises a pre-trained transformer model to generate 768-dimensional embeddings."Evidence: Source Code Analysis
ClassifierModel.py, lines 89-102: forward() method implements scoring logic using extracted feature vectors.Evidence: Configuration Files
moderation_config.yaml: threshold_score: 0.85, action_on_exceed: "FLAG_FOR_REVIEW"Evidence: API Response Logs
Sample response showing automatic flagging when score > threshold: {"status": "flagged", "score": 0.91, "review_queue": "priority"}Evidence: Model Architecture
model_spec.json confirms ResNet-50 backbone with custom classification head, consistent with CNN architecture.Evidence: Database Schema
review_queue table schema includes flagged_content_id, timestamp, priority_score columns matching claim requirements.Evidence: Configuration Logic
ThresholdManager.java implements adaptive threshold adjustment based on precision/recall metrics from validation set.Evidence: Embedding Generation
EmbeddingService.java, lines 45-78: generateSemanticEmbeddings() uses sentence-transformers to create 768-dimensional vectors.Evidence: Prior Art Reference
US Patent 9,123,456, Fig. 3: Similar CNN architecture for image classification disclosed in 2015.Claim 1 [preamble]
A computer-implemented method for content moderation comprising:Claim 1.1
receiving, by one or more processors, a content item submitted to an online platform;Claim 1.2
extracting, by the one or more processors, a plurality of features from the content item using a trained machine learning model;Claim 1.3
generating, by the one or more processors, a classification score based on the extracted features;Claim 1.4
comparing the classification score to a predetermined threshold value;Claim 1.5
in response to the classification score exceeding the threshold, automatically flagging the content item for review.Claim 2
The method of claim 1, wherein the trained machine learning model comprises a convolutional neural network.Claim 3
The method of claim 1, wherein extracting the plurality of features comprises identifying semantic embeddings.Claim 4
The method of claim 1, further comprising storing flagged content items in a review queue database.Claim 5
The method of claim 1, wherein the predetermined threshold is dynamically adjusted based on historical accuracy metrics.Evidence: Source Code Analysis
ContentModerationService.java, lines 142-156: processSubmission() method receives content via API endpoint and initiates classification pipeline.Evidence: Technical Documentation
Architecture Doc v2.3, Section 4.1: "The feature extraction module utilises a pre-trained transformer model to generate 768-dimensional embeddings."Evidence: Source Code Analysis
ClassifierModel.py, lines 89-102: forward() method implements scoring logic using extracted feature vectors.Evidence: Configuration Files
moderation_config.yaml: threshold_score: 0.85, action_on_exceed: "FLAG_FOR_REVIEW"Evidence: API Response Logs
Sample response showing automatic flagging when score > threshold: {"status": "flagged", "score": 0.91, "review_queue": "priority"}Evidence: Model Architecture
model_spec.json confirms ResNet-50 backbone with custom classification head, consistent with CNN architecture.Evidence: Database Schema
review_queue table schema includes flagged_content_id, timestamp, priority_score columns matching claim requirements.Evidence: Configuration Logic
ThresholdManager.java implements adaptive threshold adjustment based on precision/recall metrics from validation set.Evidence: Embedding Generation
EmbeddingService.java, lines 45-78: generateSemanticEmbeddings() uses sentence-transformers to create 768-dimensional vectors.Evidence: Prior Art Reference
US Patent 9,123,456, Fig. 3: Similar CNN architecture for image classification disclosed in 2015.Full pack
The committee replacement.
Seven tiers, one signed recommendation — the whole underwriting case in a single document. Ten days. Screen fees credit in full. Price on application.
What's in it
Seven tiers, one signed call
01
Claim charts
Element-by-element mapping of the asserted claims to the target's product or method.
02
Prior art
The references that bear on validity, graph-connected to where they've already survived or fallen.
03
Damages
Quantum across independent methods, benchmarked to comparable verdicts and settlements.
04
Counsel
Who to instruct, and their record in this court, on this issue, against this opponent.
05
Risk
Where the case is exposed — venue, posture, validity, the reversal tail.
06
Intelligence
The judge, the defendant's settlement behaviour, the opponent's litigation history.
07
Timeline
Expected duration to each milestone, with the distribution, not a single guess.
✓
Signed recommendation
One call, signed. The number is neutral; the opinion is ours.
No confidential detail goes into a web form. Tell us the shape here; the portfolio, the targets, and the brief come later, under NDA.
What you'll need
Have these ready
- —The patent(s) or portfolio in scope
- —The target(s) you'd assert against
- —Jurisdiction(s) and posture (pre-suit, in litigation, pre-investment)
- —What the pack needs to settle — the decision you're making
We collect these under NDA once we've made contact — not on this page. A screen you've already run credits in full against the pack.
Start the conversation
No deal details here — just so we can reach you.