Intelligence

The intelligence layer.

Patent enforcement runs on information. We built the infrastructure that connects all of it.

The Problem

Fragmented tools

Patent SearchFind patents by keyword
Case DatabaseLook up filings
Attorney DataCheck profiles
Judge AnalyticsReview ruling stats
Damages ExpertHire per engagement

Each tool sees one part of the picture. None of them talk to each other. You pay for five subscriptions and still do the integration yourself.

The Graph

We connected everything

191MPatents
8MCases
340K+Litigants
140K+Attorneys
Connected
6K+Judges
46K+Firms
3.7K+Precedents
50+Jurisdictions

Data from Google Patents, USPTO, EPO, national offices, CourtListener, and 30+ additional sources. Updated daily.

Relationships

PatentCase

Which patents were litigated, and what happened

CaseJudge

Which judges presided, and how they ruled

JudgeAttorney

How each attorney performs with each judge

AttorneyFirm

Which firms win in which courts

CaseOutcome

Settlement, trial, dismissal, and damages awarded

PatentFamily

Connected patents across all jurisdictions

Capabilities

What the platform does

01

Target Intelligence

Who to enforce against, in what order, and why. Litigation history, counsel track record, settlement patterns, vulnerability timing.

02

Damages Intelligence

What the patent is worth against each target. Seven independent valuation methods that cross-check each other.

03

Outcome Prediction

What will happen if you file. Models trained on 8M historical cases predict settlement probability, dismissal risk, expected damages, and duration.

04

Strategic Monitoring

What your targets are facing right now. Continuous tracking of litigation, verdicts, settlements, and regulatory actions.

05

Campaign Strategy

How to sequence enforcement, when to move, when to wait. Each action improves the position for the next.

Comparison

What this replaces

Traditional

Manual prior art searches at £500-2,000 each

Platform

191M patents searchable by technology, claims, and citation network

Traditional

Expert reports at £50-100K per engagement

Platform

Economic models producing analytical groundwork for expert testimony

Traditional

Guesswork on settlement value

Platform

Damages estimates cross-checked seven ways with comparable verdicts tracked automatically

Traditional

Reactive strategy checked ad hoc

Platform

Continuous monitoring of cases, verdicts, settlements, regulatory actions

Traditional

Law firms researching defendants at hourly rates

Platform

Every target's litigation history, counsel, and behaviour patterns already mapped

Traditional

Static claim charts produced once

Platform

Claim-to-product mappings updated as products and prior art evolve

See the platform.

We run it on your portfolio. NDA first if needed.

Book a Call

Reader Tools

No notes yet

Select text anywhere and click
"Save" to add research notes