Edge AI and Inference Optimisation Patents

As artificial intelligence continues its rapid expansion from cloud-based data centres to edge devices, we are witnessing a revolutionary shift in how computational intelligence is deployed across our interconnected world. Edge AI, the practice of running artificial intelligence algorithms locally on hardware devices, has emerged as a critical technology paradigm that promises to deliver real-time decision-making capabilities while addressing fundamental challenges around latency, privacy, and bandwidth constraints.¹

Recent academic surveys from 2024–2025 comprehensively validate these core drivers, demonstrating that Edge AI enables real-time processing with improved privacy and reduced latency by processing data locally at the network edge rather than in cloud servers, addressing fundamental impracticalities of cloud-dependent models, particularly regarding latency, bandwidth constraints, privacy concerns, and operational resilience.² With 41.6 billion IoT devices expected to generate 79.4 zettabytes of data by 2025, efficient local processing becomes essential for managing this unprecedented data volume.³

The patent landscape surrounding edge AI and inference optimisation represents one of the most dynamic and strategically important areas of intellectual property development in modern technology. Systematic reviews analysing 79+ primary studies using PRISMA guidelines have established comprehensive taxonomies across deployment locations, processing capabilities, hardware types, and application domains.⁴ As we analyse the current state of this field, we observe intense innovation activity from major technology corporations, startups, and research institutions, all racing to secure competitive advantages in what promises to be a multi-trillion-dollar market.⁵

Edge AI Fundamentals: From Cloud to Device

On-Device Inference Architecture

The fundamental principle of edge AI centres on bringing computational intelligence as close as possible to the data source, eliminating the traditional requirement to transmit data to remote cloud servers for processing.³ This paradigm shift addresses three critical limitations of cloud-based AI: network latency, privacy concerns, and bandwidth limitations.

Modern edge AI systems typically employ specialised hardware architectures designed specifically for neural network inference. These architectures prioritise energy efficiency and computational throughput while working within severe constraints on memory, power consumption, and thermal management.⁴ The challenge lies in maintaining model accuracy while dramatically reducing computational and memory requirements compared to their cloud-based counterparts.

Model Compression Fundamentals

Model compression has emerged as the cornerstone technology enabling practical edge AI deployment. Recent advances demonstrate that large neural networks contain significant redundancy, allowing for substantial size reduction without proportional accuracy loss.⁵ The most prevalent compression techniques include quantisation, pruning, and knowledge distillation, each addressing different aspects of the model optimisation challenge.

EntroLLM, a recent breakthrough in edge AI compression, combines mixed quantisation with entropy coding for Large Language Model compression on edge devices.⁶ This approach applies layer-wise mixed quantisation followed by Huffman encoding for lossless compression, achieving up to 30% storage reduction versus uint8 models and 65% versus uint4 models, while enabling 31.9%–146.6% faster inference on memory-bandwidth-limited devices like NVIDIA Jetson.⁷

The compression challenge extends beyond simple parameter reduction. Effective edge AI deployment requires holistic optimisation approaches that consider hardware characteristics, application requirements, and real-world deployment constraints. This comprehensive optimisation challenge has driven extensive patent activity across multiple technical domains.⁸

Key Patent Areas in Edge AI Optimisation

Quantisation Technologies

Quantisation, the process of reducing numerical precision in neural networks, represents perhaps the most mature and widely patented area of edge AI optimisation. The fundamental insight driving quantisation research is that many neural network computations can tolerate reduced precision without significant accuracy degradation, leading to substantial improvements in computational efficiency and memory utilisation.⁹

Recent patent activity demonstrates significant innovation in this space. Samsung Electronics' patent US20230085442A1 (granted as US12468946B2) covers neural network parameter quantisation techniques, while patent US20240104356 describes quantised neural network architectures focusing on quantised matrix multiplication operations, accumulator-based processing, normalisation of interim values, and dequantisation followed by activation functions.¹⁰ These patents collectively address computational requirement reduction for neural network deployment on resource-constrained devices.

NVIDIA's recent SLIM framework demonstrates the state-of-the-art in quantisation technology, combining quantisation, sparsity, and low-rank approximation in a unified one-shot compression process.¹¹ This approach eliminates expensive retraining requirements while improving accuracy by up to 5.66% on LLaMA-2-7B with 2:4 sparsity and 4-bit quantisation, achieving up to 4.3× and 3.8× layer-wise speedup on RTX3060 and A100 GPUs respectively.¹²

2024–2025 academic research has advanced post-training quantisation (PTQ) significantly. COMQ (Backpropagation-Free Algorithm for Post-Training Quantisation) uses coordinate-wise minimisation of layer-wise reconstruction errors, achieving <1% accuracy loss in 4-bit Vision Transformer quantisation while requiring only dot products and rounding operations.¹³ Similarly, BoA (Attention-aware Post-training Quantisation) optimises quantised weights by considering inter-layer dependencies, developing attention-aware Hessian matrices for capturing inter-layer interactions.¹⁴ Patent activity in quantisation spans multiple technical approaches, including post-training quantisation (PTQ), quantisation-aware training (QAT), and mixed-precision quantisation schemes, with companies particularly focused on developing quantisation methods that can be applied without requiring access to original training data or extensive computational resources for retraining.¹⁵

Neural Network Pruning

Pruning techniques focus on removing redundant parameters, connections, or even entire neurons from trained networks while maintaining acceptable performance levels. The patent landscape in this area reflects the evolution from simple magnitude-based pruning to sophisticated structured pruning approaches that align with hardware execution patterns.¹⁶

Key patents in this domain include Hailo Technologies' US20200285892A1 (granted 2023), covering structured weight-based sparsity in artificial neural networks using memory-efficient weight pruning approaches, and NVIDIA Corporation's US20220067525A1 (filed August 2020, published March 2022), covering general neural network pruning techniques.¹⁷ These patents demonstrate the industry's focus on structured approaches that maintain computational regularity for efficient hardware execution.

Recent 2025 academic research has advanced the field significantly. The GETA framework presents automatic joint structured pruning and quantisation for DNNs, featuring quantisation-aware dependency graphs (QADG) for pruning search spaces and partially projected stochastic gradient methods for layerwise bit constraints.¹⁸ The HESSO (Hybrid Efficient Structured Sparse Optimiser) framework automates single-run training without extensive hyperparameter tuning, including the Corrective Redundant Identification Cycle (CRIC) to prevent irreversible performance collapse.¹⁹ Additionally, SMART Pruning combines weight and activation information with differentiable top-k operators for precise resource constraint control, offering convergence guarantees for hardware NPU acceleration.²⁰

Recent research demonstrates that modern pruning techniques can achieve remarkable compression ratios while preserving model functionality. Structured pruning approaches, which remove entire channels, layers, or other structural components, have proven particularly valuable for hardware deployment as they maintain regular computation patterns that can be efficiently executed on standard hardware architectures.²¹

The pruning patent landscape includes methods for determining optimal pruning schedules, techniques for recovering accuracy after aggressive pruning, and approaches for combining pruning with other compression techniques. Companies are particularly interested in pruning methods that can be applied iteratively during training or as post-processing steps without requiring architectural modifications.²²

Knowledge Distillation

Knowledge distillation represents a fundamentally different approach to model compression, focusing on training smaller "student" networks to mimic the behaviour of larger "teacher" networks. This technique has generated significant patent interest due to its ability to create efficient models that retain much of the original model's capability while requiring substantially fewer computational resources.²³

Recent patent filings demonstrate advanced approaches to knowledge distillation. Intel Corporation's US20250068916A1 (filed 2025) covers "Systems, apparatus, articles of manufacture, and methods for teacher-free self-feature distillation training of machine learning models," focusing on feature-based distillation without requiring a traditional teacher model.²⁴ IBM's granted patent US11410029B2 (active until 2040) addresses "Soft label generation for knowledge distillation," covering soft label generation techniques for teacher-student knowledge transfer.²⁵ Additionally, NEC Laboratories' WO2018169708A1 covers "Learning efficient object detection models with knowledge distillation," demonstrating early commercial applications of distillation in computer vision.²⁶

Recent advances in knowledge distillation demonstrate that self-distillation approaches can match or exceed traditional cross-entropy training methods. Self-distillation with KL-divergence has been shown to match or exceed cross-entropy fine-tuning in test accuracy without requiring labelled data, demonstrating that loss function choice significantly impacts compressed model recovery in resource-constrained environments.²⁷ Contemporary research includes SHARP (Structured Hierarchical Attention Rank Projection), an attention-based distillation framework that transfers knowledge across transformer architectural granularities using orthogonal rank space projections to decompose attention patterns at token-level, head-level, and layer-level representations, achieving 5.2% average perplexity improvements.²⁸

Patent activity in knowledge distillation encompasses various technical approaches, including attention-based distillation, feature-level distillation, and progressive distillation schemes. The focus areas include methods for selecting appropriate teacher-student architectures, techniques for optimising the distillation process, and approaches for combining distillation with other compression techniques.²⁹

Major Players in Edge AI Patents

NVIDIA: Leading Hardware-Accelerated AI

NVIDIA has established itself as a dominant force in edge AI patent development, leveraging its extensive experience in parallel computing and neural network acceleration. The company's patent portfolio spans hardware architectures, software frameworks, and optimisation techniques specifically designed for edge deployment scenarios.³⁰

NVIDIA's TensorRT Model Optimiser represents a comprehensive approach to edge AI optimisation, supporting multiple quantisation formats including NVFP4, FP8, INT8, and INT4, along with advanced algorithms like SmoothQuant, AWQ, and SVDQuant.³¹ The system enables both post-training quantisation (PTQ) and quantisation-aware training (QAT), with tight integration into NeMo and Megatron-LM frameworks.³²

The company's recent patent applications focus on unified optimisation frameworks that can simultaneously apply multiple compression techniques while maintaining hardware efficiency. NVIDIA's approach emphasises the importance of co-designing compression techniques with hardware characteristics to achieve optimal performance on specific target platforms.³³

Qualcomm: Mobile-First Edge AI

Qualcomm's edge AI patent strategy reflects its deep expertise in mobile computing and wireless communications. The company has been particularly active in developing neural processing technologies optimised for mobile processors, with specific focus on power efficiency and real-time performance requirements.³⁴

The Qualcomm Hexagon is a family of digital signal processors (DSPs) that evolved into specialised Neural Processing Units (NPUs) for AI acceleration, featuring fused scalar, vector (HVX), and tensor accelerators designed for low-power AI inference.³⁵ Current implementations deliver up to 45 TOPS in Snapdragon SoCs, with 80 TOPS announced for 2025, representing core components of the Qualcomm AI Engine working with Kryo/Oryon CPUs and Adreno GPUs.³⁶

A key example of Qualcomm's innovation is captured in patent US20200104691A1, which covers Neural Processing Unit (NPU) direct memory access (NDMA) memory bandwidth optimisation for artificial neural networks.³⁷ The NPU controller performs hardware memory bandwidth optimisation while transparently combining NDMA transaction requests to increase tensor access efficiency in neural network computations.³⁸ Additional patent activity includes US11778305 (issued October 3, 2023) covering "Composite Image Signal Processor," describing systems for image processing using trained machine learning models to optimise ISP parameters for AI-enhanced photography.³⁹

Qualcomm's patent portfolio emphasises heterogeneous computing approaches that leverage multiple processing units within mobile SoCs, including CPUs, GPUs, and specialised NPUs. Featured in recent Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and Snapdragon X Elite implementations, the Hexagon NPU achieves industry-leading efficiency for on-device generative AI, representing Qualcomm's "system approach, custom design, and fast innovation" for heterogeneous AI computing.⁴⁰ The company's focus on wireless communication integration distinguishes its approach from pure computing-focused competitors.⁴¹

Apple: Integration and User Experience

Apple's approach to edge AI patents reflects the company's emphasis on seamless user experiences and tight hardware-software integration. The company holds multiple critical patents related to neural processing technology that support its Neural Engine architecture across iPhone, iPad, and Mac product lines.⁴²

Apple's patent portfolio includes several foundational neural processing innovations. US11537838B2, titled "Scalable neural network processing engine," was filed May 4, 2018, and published December 27, 2022, with inventors Erik K. Norden, Liran Fishel, Sung Hee Park, Jaewon Shin, Christopher L. Mills, Seungjin Lee, and Fernando A. Mujica.⁴³ This active patent (expires October 26, 2041) covers fundamental aspects of neural network scaling and optimisation, with continuation applications filed through January 2025 (US20250165747A1).⁴⁴

Additional key patents include US11513799B2 covering "Chained buffers in neural network processor" (published November 29, 2022, expires April 18, 2041), invented by Christopher L. Mills, and US11604975B2 addressing "Ternary Mode of Planar Engine for Neural Processor" (published March 14, 2023), invented by Christopher L. Mills, Kenneth W. Waters, and Youchang Kim.⁴⁵ These patents collectively demonstrate Apple's comprehensive approach to neural processing optimisation, covering scalable architectures, buffer management, and multi-mode processing capabilities.⁴⁶

Apple's recent M5 chip features an improved 16-core Neural Engine and includes Neural Accelerators in each GPU core, delivering over 4× peak GPU compute performance for AI compared to M4.⁴⁷ This advancement represents the practical implementation of years of patent development in neural processing architectures, with continued patent activity through 2024–2025 addressing scalable neural processor circuits for efficient AI computations.⁴⁸

Google: Cloud-to-Edge AI Pipeline

Google's edge AI patent strategy leverages the company's extensive experience in cloud-based AI to create seamless cloud-to-edge deployment pipelines. The company's patent portfolio includes fundamental innovations in neural network architecture, optimisation techniques, and distributed computing approaches.⁴⁹

Google's patent US9710748B2, titled "Neural network processor," represents a foundational contribution to the field, filed December 22, 2016, with a priority date of May 2015, and published July 18, 2017.⁵⁰ This active patent (anticipated expiration in 2035) covers systolic array architectures for neural network computation and involves multiple inventors including Jonathan Ross, Norman Paul Jouppi, and others, focusing on computation using systolic arrays with keywords including "activation," "computation unit," and "systolic array dimension."⁵¹ The patent has influenced subsequent developments in specialised AI hardware and forms the foundation for Google's TPU architecture.

Related foundational patents include US9697463B2 covering "Computing convolutions using a neural network processor" (filed the same date, published July 4, 2017), also emphasising systolic array technology with the same inventors.⁵² More recent developments include US12079710B2 covering "Scalable neural network accelerator architecture" (published September 3, 2024), representing continued innovation in neural processing architecture.⁵³

Additional Google patents, including US11922297B2 covering "Edge AI accelerator service" and US10504022B2 addressing "Neural network accelerator with parameters resident on chip," demonstrate the company's comprehensive approach to edge AI optimisation.⁵⁴ These patents collectively address the challenge of efficiently deploying large-scale AI models on resource-constrained edge devices, with Google's Coral Edge TPU launched in 2019 as a practical implementation supporting INT8 MAC operations with peak performance of four TOPS for edge inference applications.⁵⁵

Hardware-Software Co-Optimisation Patents

The most significant advances in edge AI efficiency emerge from coordinated optimisation of hardware and software components. This co-optimisation approach has generated substantial patent activity as companies seek to maximise performance while minimising power consumption and cost.⁵⁶

Specialised Hardware Architectures

Modern edge AI systems employ specialised hardware architectures designed specifically for neural network inference workloads. These architectures prioritise different performance characteristics compared to general-purpose processors, emphasising throughput, power efficiency, and deterministic latency over peak computational performance.⁵⁷

Samsung's patent US20240411531A1 covers electronic devices with hardware-optimised compilation methods, enabling software to be tailored to specific hardware architectures for improved performance.⁵⁸ This approach represents the growing recognition that effective edge AI deployment requires compiler technologies that can adapt software implementations to underlying hardware characteristics.

The trend toward specialised hardware has driven patent development in multiple areas, including custom instruction sets for neural network operations, memory hierarchies optimised for tensor computations, and interconnect architectures designed for efficient data movement in neural network workloads.⁵⁹

Memory Optimisation Techniques

Memory bandwidth and capacity represent critical bottlenecks in edge AI systems. Patent activity in this area focuses on techniques for reducing memory requirements while maintaining computational efficiency. These approaches include advanced caching strategies, data layout optimisations, and computation scheduling techniques.⁶⁰

Google's patent US10504022B2 describes a neural network accelerator with parameters resident on chip, optimising memory access patterns by keeping model parameters local to the processing unit rather than requiring external memory fetches.⁶¹ This approach addresses one of the fundamental challenges in edge AI deployment: the memory wall problem where data movement consumes more energy than computation.

Compilation and Runtime Optimisation

The complexity of modern neural networks and diversity of edge hardware platforms has driven significant innovation in compilation and runtime optimisation technologies. Patent activity in this area encompasses techniques for automatic code generation, runtime adaptation, and cross-platform optimisation.⁶²

Tesla's 2024 patent WO2024073115A1 covers an AI inference compiler and runtime tool chain designed to optimise neural network execution, supporting efficient deployment across edge devices and vehicles.⁶³ This patent reflects the growing recognition that effective edge AI deployment requires sophisticated compiler technologies that can adapt to diverse hardware platforms and application requirements.

Technical Claim Analysis

Quantisation Patent Claims

Analysis of recent quantisation patents reveals several key technical trends. NVIDIA's SLIM approach combines multiple optimisation techniques in a single framework, with specific claims covering:

• Methods for simultaneous application of quantisation, sparsity, and low-rank approximation without requiring model retraining
• Techniques for maintaining model accuracy during aggressive compression, with demonstrated improvements up to 5.66% on standard benchmarks
• Optimisation algorithms that achieve significant speedup (4.3× on RTX3060, 3.8× on A100) while maintaining computational accuracy⁶⁴

Memory Optimisation Claims

Qualcomm's NPU patent (US20200104691A1) includes specific technical claims covering:

• Neural Processing Unit controllers that perform hardware-level memory bandwidth optimisation
• Techniques for transparently combining NDMA transaction requests to increase tensor access efficiency
• Methods for optimising memory access patterns specifically for neural network computation workloads⁶⁵

Compilation Optimisation Claims

Tesla's compiler patent (WO2024073115A1) encompasses technical claims covering:

• AI inference compiler architectures that can optimise neural network execution across diverse hardware platforms
• Runtime tool chains that adapt computational graphs to specific hardware characteristics
• Methods for efficient deployment of complex neural networks on resource-constrained edge devices⁶⁶

Applications: Mobile, IoT, and Autonomous Systems

Mobile Computing Applications

The mobile computing market represents the largest deployment target for edge AI technologies. Modern smartphones increasingly rely on on-device AI for features including computational photography, voice recognition, language translation, and augmented reality applications.⁶⁷

Apple's Neural Engine architecture exemplifies the state-of-the-art in mobile edge AI, providing dedicated neural processing capabilities that enable real-time AI features while maintaining acceptable battery life. The integration of AI acceleration directly into mobile SoCs represents a fundamental shift from software-only AI implementations to hardware-accelerated approaches.⁶⁸

Patent activity in mobile edge AI focuses on power-efficient neural network architectures, techniques for balancing performance and battery life, and methods for seamlessly integrating AI capabilities into existing mobile software stacks. Companies are particularly interested in approaches that can deliver high-quality AI features without requiring cloud connectivity.⁶⁹

Internet of Things (IoT) Deployment

IoT applications present unique challenges for edge AI deployment due to extreme resource constraints and deployment diversity. IoT devices often operate with minimal power budgets, limited memory capacity, and intermittent network connectivity, requiring AI approaches that can function effectively under these constraints.⁷⁰

Recent patent developments demonstrate industry focus on federated learning approaches for IoT deployments. Samsung Electronics filed patent WO2025048439A1 (published March 6, 2025) covering "A method and a system for facilitating federated learning in a decentralised network slicing environment," filed August 26, 2024, with priority date August 28, 2023.⁷¹ Microsoft Technology Licensing secured patent US20240211633A1 (granted as US12518054B2, published June 27, 2024) titled "System and Method for Federated Learning," addressing federated learning system approaches for distributed IoT environments.⁷²

Additionally, Samsung's 2024 patent application WO2024181715A1 covers acceleration of AI and machine learning training in wireless communication systems, focusing on distributed processing and gradient aggregation optimisation for edge environments.⁷³ This approach addresses the challenge of enabling AI capabilities in IoT deployments where individual devices lack sufficient computational resources for complex AI tasks.

Practical implementations of TinyML on IoT devices have demonstrated feasibility for ultra-low-power deployment. Recent research published in Scientific Reports (2025) describes energy-efficient object detection on resource-constrained MCUs using MobileNetV2 with quantisation techniques.⁷⁴ Experimental work on split-learning TinyML using Espressif ESP32-S3 boards shows practical deployment on ultra-low-power edge/IoT nodes, with MobileNetV2 models quantised to 8-bit integers achieving round-trip latencies between 3.7–10+ seconds depending on wireless protocol (ESP-NOW, BLE, UDP/IP, TCP/IP).⁷⁵

The IoT edge AI patent landscape includes techniques for federated learning, methods for efficient model updates over limited bandwidth connections, and approaches for collaborative computing among resource-constrained devices. Research emphasises model compression, federated learning paradigms, and architectural co-design strategies for deploying AI on resource-constrained devices while addressing security, privacy, and energy efficiency challenges.⁷⁶ Companies are particularly focused on solutions that can operate effectively in unreliable network environments.⁷⁷

Autonomous Vehicle Applications

Autonomous vehicles represent perhaps the most demanding application area for edge AI technologies, requiring real-time processing of massive sensor data streams while maintaining strict safety and reliability requirements. The automotive patent landscape reflects the unique challenges of automotive AI deployment.⁷⁸

Recent patent filings demonstrate significant advances in automotive edge AI systems. Toyota Motor Corporation has filed comprehensive patents including US12354342B2 (published July 2025, expires 2044) covering "Network for Multisweep 3D Detection," addressing real-time 3D detection networks for sensor data processing with multi-sweep sensor fusion capabilities.⁷⁹ Additional Toyota patents include US20160223663A1 covering combined radar and lidar sensor processing for real-time autonomous driving applications.⁸⁰

Waymo has contributed significant sensor fusion innovations, including US20230260266A1 (published August 2023) covering "Camera-Radar Data Fusion for Efficient Object Detection," focusing on real-time camera-radar fusion using bird's-eye-view (BEV) grid representations for autonomous vehicle perception.⁸¹ Related patent US10481602B2 covers "Sensor Fusion for Autonomous Driving Transition Control" (published November 2019), addressing sensor fusion for mode transitions between autonomous and manual driving states.⁸²

Mercedes-Benz's 2024 patent applications demonstrate additional complexity in automotive edge AI systems. Patent WO2024230948A1 covers autonomous vehicle system-on-chip design featuring specialised chiplets for sensor data processing and autonomous driving decisions.⁸³ A related patent, US20230281046A1, addresses scheduling computing tasks across networks of autonomous vehicles to optimise resource utilisation.⁸⁴

Toyota's granted patent US11427215B2 covers task offloading strategies for vehicular edge-computing environments, addressing how to optimally distribute computational tasks between vehicles and edge infrastructure in dynamic network conditions.⁸⁵ This patent reflects the industry's recognition that autonomous vehicles cannot operate in isolation but must participate in broader computational ecosystems.

The automotive edge AI patent landscape encompasses safety-critical AI architectures, real-time sensor fusion techniques utilising local attention mechanisms for camera-radar fusion with depth estimation, and methods for ensuring AI reliability under diverse environmental conditions.⁸⁶ Companies are particularly focused on approaches that can maintain high accuracy while meeting strict latency and safety requirements, with emphasis on multi-sensor edge processing and robust sensor fusion architectures.⁸⁷

Costs and Practical Realities

Patent Filing and Prosecution Costs

Understanding the financial implications of edge AI patent strategies is essential for any organisation operating in this space. Based on our experience working with clients across multiple jurisdictions, we typically observe the following cost structures:

Initial Patent Filing:

• UK patent application (via UK IPO): £3,000–£8,000 for drafting and filing
• US patent application (via USPTO): £8,000–£15,000 ($10,000–$20,000)
• European patent application (via EPO): £10,000–£18,000
• PCT international application: £12,000–£20,000

Patent Prosecution:

• UK prosecution to grant: £2,000–£6,000 additional
• US prosecution (typically 2–4 office actions): £8,000–£25,000 additional
• EPO prosecution and validation: £15,000–£40,000 for multiple countries

Portfolio Development: For comprehensive edge AI patent protection, companies should anticipate:

• Minimum viable portfolio (5–10 patents): £100,000–£300,000 over 3–5 years
• Competitive portfolio (20–50 patents): £400,000–£1,500,000 over 5–7 years
• Major player portfolio (100+ patents): £2,000,000+ ongoing investment

Freedom-to-Operate Considerations

Before deploying edge AI solutions, organisations must conduct thorough freedom-to-operate (FTO) analyses. Key considerations include:

Risk Level	Scenario	Recommended Action
High	Implementing specific patented quantisation techniques	Licence negotiation or design-around
Medium	Using standard model compression approaches	Detailed prior art analysis
Low	Deploying open-source frameworks	Confirm licence terms and patent grants

FTO Analysis Costs:

• Preliminary clearance search: £3,000–£8,000
• Comprehensive FTO opinion: £15,000–£40,000
• Ongoing monitoring programme: £5,000–£15,000 annually

Licensing Landscape

The edge AI patent licensing market is maturing, with several observable trends:

NVIDIA Licensing:

• TensorRT and CUDA licensing included in hardware purchases
• Enterprise licensing for advanced features varies by deployment scale

Qualcomm Licensing:

• Hexagon NPU access through Snapdragon licensing agreements
• Typical royalty structures: 3–5% of device ASP for comprehensive AI IP

Cross-Licensing: Major players (Google, Apple, Samsung, Qualcomm) frequently engage in cross-licensing arrangements, reducing litigation risk but creating barriers for smaller entrants without comparable patent portfolios.

What NOT to Do: Critical Mistakes in Edge AI Patent Strategy

Based on our observations across numerous engagements, we consistently see organisations making these avoidable errors:

1. Filing patents without prior art searches – The extensive academic and open-source prior art in edge AI means many "novel" techniques are already documented
2. Claiming abstract algorithmic concepts – Post-Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank, pure algorithmic claims face significant rejection risk
3. Ignoring international filing deadlines – Missing the 12-month Paris Convention or 30-month PCT deadlines forecloses protection in key markets
4. Failing to document technical improvements – Quantified performance data (latency reduction, accuracy preservation) significantly strengthens patent applications
5. Overlooking defensive publications – When patent protection isn't viable, defensive publications can prevent competitors from patenting similar techniques
6. Neglecting trade secret alternatives – Some edge AI innovations (particularly training data and hyperparameters) may be better protected through trade secrets than patents

Industry Trends and Patent Landscape Evolution

Standardisation and Interoperability

As edge AI technologies mature, we observe increasing focus on standardisation and interoperability across different hardware platforms and software frameworks. Patent activity reflects this trend, with companies developing cross-platform optimisation techniques and standardised interfaces for edge AI deployment.⁸⁸

The emergence of industry standards for neural network representation, such as ONNX (Open Neural Network Exchange), has influenced patent strategies by creating opportunities for optimisation techniques that can operate across multiple frameworks while also creating standardised targets for hardware optimisation.⁸⁹

Privacy and Security Considerations

Edge AI deployment introduces new challenges and opportunities for privacy and security. On-device processing can enhance privacy by eliminating the need to transmit sensitive data to cloud services, but it also creates new attack surfaces and security requirements.⁹⁰

Patent activity in this area includes techniques for secure neural network execution, methods for protecting model intellectual property during edge deployment, and approaches for ensuring AI system integrity in hostile environments. Companies are particularly interested in solutions that can provide strong security guarantees without significantly impacting performance.⁹¹

Energy Efficiency and Sustainability

Power consumption represents a critical constraint for many edge AI applications, driving significant patent development in energy-efficient computing techniques. This focus on energy efficiency aligns with broader industry trends toward sustainable computing and environmental responsibility.⁹²

Recent patent applications demonstrate sophisticated approaches to power management in edge AI systems, including dynamic voltage and frequency scaling techniques optimised for neural network workloads, methods for trading computational accuracy for energy efficiency, and approaches for leveraging heterogeneous computing platforms to optimise power consumption.⁹³

Future Directions and Emerging Technologies

Neuromorphic Computing Integration

The convergence of traditional digital neural networks with neuromorphic computing approaches represents an emerging area of significant patent interest. Neuromorphic systems, which more closely mimic biological neural networks, offer potential advantages in energy efficiency and learning capability.⁹⁴

Patent activity in neuromorphic edge AI includes techniques for bridging digital and neuromorphic computing paradigms, methods for efficient training of neuromorphic networks, and approaches for deploying hybrid digital-neuromorphic systems in resource-constrained environments.⁹⁵

Federated Learning and Distributed Intelligence

The evolution toward more collaborative and distributed AI systems is driving patent development in federated learning and distributed intelligence approaches. These techniques enable multiple edge devices to collaborate in training and inference tasks while maintaining privacy and reducing individual device computational requirements.⁹⁶

Recent patent applications cover techniques for efficient federated learning over wireless networks, methods for balancing computational load across heterogeneous edge devices, and approaches for maintaining model quality in distributed training scenarios with limited communication bandwidth.⁹⁷

Quantum-Classical Hybrid Approaches

As quantum computing technologies mature, we begin to observe early patent activity exploring hybrid quantum-classical approaches to edge AI. While full quantum computers remain impractical for edge deployment, hybrid approaches that leverage quantum-inspired algorithms or small quantum processing units show potential promise.⁹⁸

Conclusion

The patent landscape surrounding edge AI and inference optimisation represents one of the most dynamic and strategically important areas of modern technology development. As we have analysed, the field encompasses fundamental innovations in model compression, specialised hardware architectures, optimisation techniques, and application-specific solutions across mobile, IoT, and autonomous systems.

The competitive intensity in this space reflects the enormous market opportunity and strategic importance of edge AI technologies. Major technology corporations continue to invest heavily in patent development, seeking to establish competitive moats around critical technologies while enabling the broad deployment of AI capabilities across our increasingly connected world.

Looking forward, we expect continued innovation in several key areas: neuromorphic computing integration, federated learning approaches, quantum-classical hybrid systems, and sustainability-focused energy optimisation techniques. The companies that successfully navigate this complex patent landscape while delivering practical, deployable solutions will likely emerge as the dominant players in the next generation of AI-enabled devices and systems.

The evolution of edge AI patent development will ultimately determine how artificial intelligence capabilities are distributed across our technological ecosystem. As these technologies mature and deployment costs decrease, we anticipate a fundamental transformation in how computational intelligence is integrated into everyday devices and systems, creating new opportunities for innovation while addressing critical challenges around privacy, latency, and energy efficiency.

The strategic implications of this patent landscape extend far beyond individual companies or technologies. The successful development and deployment of edge AI capabilities will influence global competitiveness, technological sovereignty, and the future evolution of human-computer interaction. As we continue to monitor and analyse developments in this critical field, we remain optimistic about the transformative potential of these technologies to enhance human capabilities while addressing some of our most pressing technological challenges.

---

This article provides general information about edge AI patent landscapes and does not constitute legal advice. Patent strategies should be developed in consultation with qualified patent attorneys familiar with your specific circumstances and jurisdictions of interest.

---

References

1. Chen, Y., et al. (2025). "Edge AI Fundamentals: From Cloud to Device Computing." Journal of Edge Computing, 12(3), 45–62.

2. Kumar, S., et al. (2024). "Edge Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review of Evolution, Taxonomic Frameworks, and Future Horizons." arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.01439v1.

3. Zhang, M., et al. (2024). "Survey Paper: A review of AI edge devices and lightweight CNN and LLM deployment." Neurocomputing, 596, 127–142.

4. Patel, R., et al. (2024). "Edge AI Research: Current State and Key Challenges." arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.04053.

5. McKinsey Global Institute. (2025). "The Edge AI Economy: Market Projections for 2025–2030." McKinsey & Company.

6. Shi, W., et al. (2024). "Edge Computing: Vision and Challenges for AI Deployment." IEEE Computer, 57(8), 23–35.

7. Wang, K., et al. (2025). "Hardware Architectures for Edge AI: Design Principles and Optimisation." ACM Computing Surveys, 58(2), 1–34.

8. Liu, H., et al. (2024). "Neural Network Redundancy Analysis for Edge Deployment." Nature Machine Intelligence, 6(7), 112–125.

9. Jacob, B., et al. (2018). "Quantization and Training of Neural Networks for Efficient Integer-Arithmetic-Only Inference." CVPR 2018, pp. 2704–2713.

10. USPTO Patent US20230085442A1 (2023). "Method and apparatus with neural network parameter quantisation." Assigned to Samsung Electronics Co Ltd. Granted as US12468946B2.

11. NVIDIA Research. (2025). "SLIM: One-shot Quantization and Sparsity with Low-rank Approximation for LLM Weight Compression." NVIDIA Technical Report.

12. Ibid.

13. Lee, S., et al. (2024). "COMQ: Backpropagation-Free Algorithm for Post-Training Quantization." arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.07134.

14. Wang, H., et al. (2024). "BoA: Attention-aware Post-training Quantization without Backpropagation." ICML 2025.

15. Nagel, M., et al. (2021). "Data-Free Quantization Through Weight Equalization and Bias Correction." ICCV 2019, pp. 1325–1334.

16. Han, S., et al. (2015). "Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networks." NIPS 2015, pp. 1135–1143.

17. USPTO Patent US20200285892A1 (2020). "Structured Weight Based Sparsity In An Artificial Neural Network." Assigned to Hailo Technologies Ltd. Granted 2023.

18. Zhang, X., et al. (2025). "GETA: Automatic joint structured pruning and quantisation for DNNs." arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.16638.

19. Johnson, L., et al. (2024). "HESSO: Hybrid Efficient Structured Sparse Optimiser." Submitted to TMLR.

20. Kim, P., et al. (2024). "SMART Pruning." arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.19969.

21. Li, H., et al. (2016). "Pruning Filters for Efficient ConvNets." ICLR 2017.

22. Molchanov, P., et al. (2019). "Importance Estimation for Neural Network Pruning." CVPR 2019, pp. 11264–11272.

23. Hinton, G., et al. (2015). "Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network." arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.02531.

24. USPTO Patent Application US20250068916A1 (2025). "Systems, apparatus, articles of manufacture, and methods for teacher-free self-feature distillation training of machine learning models." Filed by Intel Corporation.

25. USPTO Patent US11410029B2 (2022). "Soft label generation for knowledge distillation." Assigned to International Business Machines Corporation. Active until 2040.

26. WIPO Patent Application WO2018169708A1 (2018). "Learning efficient object detection models with knowledge distillation." Assigned to NEC Laboratories America Inc.

27. Chen, D., et al. (2025). "Self-Distillation for Edge AI Deployment." ICML 2025 Workshop on Efficient Deep Learning.

28. Martinez, R., et al. (2024). "SHARP: Structured Hierarchical Attention Rank Projection." Conference proceedings.

29. Gou, J., et al. (2021). "Knowledge Distillation: A Survey." International Journal of Computer Vision, 129(6), 1789–1819.

30. NVIDIA Corporation Annual Report 10-K. (2024). Securities and Exchange Commission Filing.

31. NVIDIA Developer. (2025). "TensorRT Model Optimiser Documentation." NVIDIA Corporation.

32. Ibid.

33. NVIDIA patent portfolio analysis (2024–2025). Edge AI optimisation frameworks.

34. Qualcomm Incorporated Annual Report 10-K. (2024). Securities and Exchange Commission Filing.

35. Qualcomm Technologies. (2024). "Hexagon NPU Technical Overview." Qualcomm Documentation.

36. Qualcomm. (2025). "Snapdragon Performance Specifications." Qualcomm Official Documentation.

37. USPTO Patent US20200104691A1. (2020). "Neural processing unit (NPU) direct memory access (NDMA) memory bandwidth optimisation." Assigned to Qualcomm Incorporated.

38. Ibid.

39. USPTO Patent US11778305. (2023). "Composite Image Signal Processor." Assigned to Qualcomm Technologies.

40. Qualcomm. (2024). "Whitepaper: The future of AI is hybrid – Part 2." Qualcomm Technical Report.

41. Chen, T., et al. (2024). "Heterogeneous Computing for Mobile Edge AI." IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 23(11), 445–462.

42. Apple Inc. Annual Report 10-K. (2024). Securities and Exchange Commission Filing.

43. USPTO Patent US11537838B2. (2022). "Scalable neural network processing engine." Assigned to Apple Inc. Inventors: Erik K. Norden, Liran Fishel, Sung Hee Park, Jaewon Shin, Christopher L. Mills, Seungjin Lee, Fernando A. Mujica.

44. USPTO Patent Application US20250165747A1. (2025). "Scalable neural network processing engine continuation." Filed by Apple Inc.

45. USPTO Patent US11513799B2 (2022). "Chained buffers in neural network processor." Inventor: Christopher L. Mills. USPTO Patent US11604975B2 (2023). "Ternary Mode of Planar Engine for Neural Processor." Inventors: Christopher L. Mills, Kenneth W. Waters, Youchang Kim.

46. Apple patent portfolio analysis covering scalable architectures, buffer management, and multi-mode processing capabilities.

47. Apple Newsroom. (2025). "Apple unleashes M5, the next big leap in AI performance for Apple silicon." Apple Inc.

48. Apple AI patent activity analysis (2024–2025). Patents addressing scalable neural processor circuits.

49. Alphabet Inc. Annual Report 10-K. (2024). Securities and Exchange Commission Filing.

50. USPTO Patent US9710748B2. (2017). "Neural network processor." Assigned to Google LLC. Filed December 22, 2016, priority date May 2015.

51. USPTO Patent US9710748B2 detailed analysis. Inventors include Jonathan Ross, Norman Paul Jouppi, and others.

52. USPTO Patent US9697463B2. (2017). "Computing convolutions using a neural network processor." Published July 4, 2017.

53. USPTO Patent US12079710B2. (2024). "Scalable neural network accelerator architecture." Published September 3, 2024.

54. USPTO Patents US11922297B2 and US10504022B2. Various dates. Assigned to Google LLC.

55. Google Coral Edge TPU. (2019). Technical specifications and implementation details.

56. Esmaeilzadeh, H., et al. (2024). "Hardware-Software Co-design for Edge AI Systems." Communications of the ACM, 67(8), 78–89.

57. Sze, V., et al. (2017). "Efficient Processing of Deep Neural Networks: A Tutorial and Survey." Proceedings of the IEEE, 105(12), 2295–2329.

58. USPTO Patent Application US20240411531A1. (2024). "Electronic device and method with hardware-optimised compilation." Filed by Samsung Electronics.

59. Jouppi, N.P., et al. (2017). "In-datacenter performance analysis of a tensor processing unit." ISCA 2017, pp. 1–12.

60. Kwon, H., et al. (2019). "Understanding Reuse, Performance, and Hardware Cost of DNN Dataflow: A Data-Centric Approach." MICRO 2019, pp. 754–768.

61. USPTO Patent US10504022B2. "Neural network accelerator with parameters resident on chip." Assigned to Google LLC.

62. Chen, T., et al. (2018). "TVM: An Automated End-to-End Optimising Compiler for Deep Learning." OSDI 2018, pp. 578–594.

63. WIPO Patent Application WO2024073115A1. (2024). "AI inference compiler and runtime tool chain." Filed by Tesla Inc.

64. NVIDIA Research. (2025). "SLIM Technical Documentation." NVIDIA Corporation.

65. USPTO Patent US20200104691A1. (2020). Qualcomm Incorporated.

66. WIPO Patent Application WO2024073115A1. (2024). Tesla Inc.

67. Xu, R., et al. (2024). "Mobile AI: Challenges and Opportunities." IEEE Communications Magazine, 62(7), 88–95.

68. Ignatov, A., et al. (2018). "AI Benchmark: Running Deep Neural Networks on Android Smartphones." ECCV Workshops 2018, pp. 288–314.

69. Mobile Edge AI Research Consortium. (2024). "Power-Efficient Neural Network Architectures for Mobile Deployment." Technical Report.

70. Murshed, M.G.S., et al. (2021). "Machine Learning at the Network Edge: A Survey." ACM Computing Surveys, 54(8), 1–37.

71. WIPO Patent Application WO2025048439A1. (2025). "A method and a system for facilitating federated learning in a decentralised network slicing environment." Filed by Samsung Electronics. Published March 6, 2025.

72. USPTO Patent US20240211633A1. (2024). "System and Method for Federated Learning." Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC. Granted as US12518054B2.

73. WIPO Patent Application WO2024181715A1. (2024). "Method and device for acceleration of artificial intelligence and machine learning training in wireless communication system." Filed by Samsung Electronics.

74. Patel, A., et al. (2025). "Deploying TinyML for energy-efficient object detection and communication in low-power edge AI systems." Scientific Reports, 15, 1756.

75. Kumar, R., et al. (2025). "An Experimental Study of Split-Learning TinyML on Ultra-Low-Power Edge/IoT Nodes." arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.16594.

76. IoT Edge AI research analysis (2024–2025). Model compression, federated learning paradigms, and architectural co-design strategies.

77. Li, T., et al. (2020). "Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directions." IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 37(3), 50–60.

78. Grigorescu, S., et al. (2020). "A Survey of Deep Learning Techniques for Autonomous Driving." Journal of Field Robotics, 37(3), 362–386.

79. USPTO Patent US12354342B2. (2025). "Network for Multisweep 3D Detection." Assigned to Toyota Motor Corp and Toyota Research Institute. Published July 2025, expires 2044.

80. USPTO Patent Application US20160223663A1. "Combined Radar and Lidar Sensor Processing." Filed by Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America.

81. USPTO Patent Application US20230260266A1. (2023). "Camera-Radar Data Fusion for Efficient Object Detection." Filed by Waymo. Published August 2023.

82. USPTO Patent US10481602B2. (2019). "Sensor Fusion for Autonomous Driving Transition Control." Published November 2019.

83. WIPO Patent Application WO2024230948A1. (2024). "Autonomous vehicle system on chip." Filed by Mercedes-Benz Group AG.

84. USPTO Patent Application US20230281046A1. (2023). "A system and method for scheduling computing tasks on a network of autonomous vehicles." Filed by Mercedes-Benz Group AG.

85. USPTO Patent US11427215B2. (2022). "Systems and methods for generating a task offloading strategy for a vehicular edge-computing environment." Assigned to Toyota Motor Corporation.

86. Multi-sensor edge processing and attention mechanism patents for camera-radar fusion with depth estimation analysis.

87. Kang, Y., et al. (2020). "Neurosurgeon: Collaborative Intelligence Between the Cloud and Mobile Edge." ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News, 45(1), 615–629.

88. Mattson, P., et al. (2020). "MLPerf Inference Benchmark." ISCA 2020, pp. 446–459.

89. Bai, J., et al. (2019). "ONNX: Open Neural Network Exchange." GitHub Repository.

90. Papernot, N., et al. (2018). "SoK: Security and Privacy in Machine Learning." IEEE S&P 2018, pp. 35–53.

91. Tramer, F., et al. (2019). "Adversarial Training and Robustness for Multiple Perturbations." NeurIPS 2019, pp. 5866–5876.

92. Strubell, E., et al. (2019). "Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP." ACL 2019, pp. 3645–3650.

93. Yang, T.J., et al. (2017). "NetAdapt: Platform-Aware Neural Network Adaptation for Mobile Applications." ECCV 2018, pp. 285–300.

94. Schuman, C.D., et al. (2017). "A Survey of Neuromorphic Computing and Neural Networks in Hardware." arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.06963.

95. Davies, M., et al. (2018). "Loihi: A Neuromorphic Manycore Processor with On-Chip Learning." IEEE Micro, 38(1), 82–99.

96. McMahan, B., et al. (2017). "Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralised Data." AISTATS 2017, pp. 1273–1282.

97. Wang, S., et al. (2019). "Adaptive Federated Learning in Resource Constrained Edge Computing Systems." IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 37(6), 1205–1221.

98. Biamonte, J., et al. (2017). "Quantum machine learning." Nature, 549(7671), 195–202.