Preparing for a Patent Deposition: Technical Expert's Guide

Patent deposition preparation is a high-stakes process that can make or break your case. As technical experts who have been deposed dozens of times and prepared hundreds of witnesses, we know that effective patent deposition preparation requires understanding the adversarial process, anticipating opposing counsel's strategies, mastering your analysis and file, and maintaining composure under intense questioning.123

Contrary to popular belief, empirical research tracking approximately 3,700 patent cases shows that fewer cases settle than commonly assumed—only about 5% go to trial while an additional 8-9% are resolved through summary judgment, indicating substantial adjudication rather than pure settlement.4 However, settlement values remain directly correlated with expert witness performance at depositions.5 Poor deposition testimony doesn't just damage individual cases—it can destroy an expert's professional reputation and future opportunities, as empirical research confirms that attorneys prioritize expert credibility, communication skills, and perceived trustworthiness when selecting witnesses for future cases.67

This guide provides the comprehensive framework you need to prepare effectively, avoid common pitfalls, and deliver testimony that strengthens your case rather than undermines it.

Jurisdictional Note: This article focuses primarily on US federal patent litigation under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. While many deposition preparation principles apply universally, specific procedural rules, timelines, and cost structures differ significantly in UK and European proceedings. For UK patent litigation, witness evidence typically takes the form of written witness statements rather than oral depositions, with cross-examination occurring at trial. We note key jurisdictional differences where relevant throughout this guide.

What Is a Patent Deposition?

A patent deposition is sworn testimony taken before trial as part of the discovery process in patent litigation.7 Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30, opposing counsel questions you under oath with a court reporter present, creating an official transcript that can be used at trial for impeachment or as evidence.89

Key Characteristics:

• Purpose: Discovery of your opinions, methodology, and the factual basis for your conclusions1011
• Attendees: The expert witness, opposing counsel, your retaining counsel, and a court reporter12
• Duration: While Federal Rule 30 itself contains no durational limits, many federal district courts impose time restrictions through local rules—for example, the Northern District of Oklahoma limits depositions to seven hours unless extended for good cause1314
• Output: An official transcript that becomes part of the case record and can be used at trial15
• Stakes: Your testimony directly impacts settlement negotiations and case outcomes16

Unlike friendly meetings with your retaining counsel, depositions are adversarial proceedings where opposing counsel's goal is to weaken your testimony, expose inconsistencies, and gather ammunition for trial.1718

Why Depositions Matter

Patent expert depositions have far-reaching consequences that extend well beyond the immediate case:

Case Impact

Expert witness testimony often determines case outcomes in patent litigation.19 However, empirical research reveals complex dynamics in judicial reliance on expert testimony—while the Supreme Court's 1996 Markman decision established that judges interpret patent claims, the Federal Circuit's de novo review creates disincentives for district judges to fully develop expert testimony records, potentially undermining the quality of adjudication.20 Additionally, Daubert motions challenging expert admissibility succeed approximately 24% of the time in intellectual property cases, with defendant victories on these motions associated with reduced settlement likelihood.2122 Poor deposition performance can effectively end a case before it reaches trial.

Settlement Leverage

Since most patent cases settle, your deposition performance directly influences settlement negotiations.22 Strong, consistent testimony under pressure demonstrates credibility and increases settlement value, while weak or inconsistent testimony gives opposing parties leverage to demand lower settlements.2324

Trial Impeachment

Every statement you make at deposition can be used to impeach you at trial.25 If your trial testimony contradicts your deposition testimony, opposing counsel will highlight these inconsistencies to destroy your credibility before the jury.26 The transcript becomes a permanent record that follows you throughout the case.

Professional Reputation

Your deposition performance affects your professional reputation within the legal community.27 Empirical research confirms that attorneys prioritize perceived expert trustworthiness, communication skills, and years of experience when selecting witnesses—factors directly observable during depositions.28 Attorneys regularly share information about expert witnesses, and a reputation for poor deposition performance can significantly impact future opportunities.2930

The Deposition Process

Understanding the deposition timeline and procedures helps you prepare effectively and know what to expect:

Before the Deposition

Notice Requirements: Under FRCP 30, opposing counsel must provide reasonable written notice stating the time, place, and deponent's information.30 Expert depositions can only occur after your written expert report has been disclosed under Rule 26(a)(2)(B), which requires a detailed report containing all opinions, their basis and reasons, facts or data considered, supporting exhibits, qualifications, prior testimony from the past four years, and compensation terms.31

Document Production: You may be required to produce documents related to your analysis, including drafts, communications, and supporting materials.32 Organise these materials well in advance.

Preparation Period: Most experts need 4-6 weeks of preparation time for complex patent cases, though this varies based on case complexity and your experience level.3334

Day of Deposition

Swearing In: The court reporter administers an oath, after which all your statements are made under penalty of perjury.35

Questioning Structure: Depositions typically begin with background and credentials questions, then move to document-based questions, methodology challenges, and opinion exploration.3637

Breaks: You have the right to take reasonable breaks to collect your thoughts, use the restroom, or confer with counsel on privilege issues.3839

Recording: Depositions are typically recorded stenographically, though parties may also arrange for audio or video recording.40

After the Deposition

Transcript Review: You have 30 days to review the transcript and note any necessary corrections on an errata sheet.41 However, courts increasingly restrict substantive changes, allowing only typographical or transcription corrections.4243

Potential Trial Use: Your deposition transcript may be used at trial for impeachment if your testimony changes or as substantive evidence if you become unavailable.4445

Pre-Deposition Preparation: The 4-6 Week Timeline

Effective patent deposition preparation begins 4-6 weeks before your deposition date, a timeline necessitated by Federal Rule 26's requirement for expert disclosures 90 days before trial and the need for multiple preparation sessions.46 Research supports staged preparation approaches—at least two separate meetings approximately 7-10 days before deposition, followed by final sessions a few days before testimony.47 This timeline allows for thorough document review, practice sessions, and refinement of key answers without the stress of last-minute cramming.

Weeks 4-6: Foundation Building

Master Your Expert Report: You must be intimately familiar with every opinion, calculation, assumption, and conclusion in your report.47 Any deviation during deposition may lead to exclusion or impeachment.48

Review Case Documents: Study all patents-in-suit, prior art references, prosecution histories, and technical documents you relied upon.49 Organise these materials for quick reference under pressure.

Understand Legal Standards: Familiarize yourself with relevant legal frameworks, including claim construction principles, infringement analysis standards, and validity challenges.5051

Weeks 2-3: Deep Preparation

Analyse Opposing Expert Reports: Study opposing experts' opinions to understand where conflicts exist and anticipate challenges to your methodology.52

Review Prior Testimony: If available, review transcripts of your previous depositions to identify patterns in your testimony and areas where you've been effectively challenged.5354

Organise Personal Files: Ensure all documents in your case file are organised and easily accessible during the deposition.55 Never sanitize your file by removing damaging documents—this destroys credibility if discovered.56

Week 1: Final Preparation

Mock Deposition Sessions: Conduct practice sessions with your retaining counsel, focusing on likely challenge areas and difficult questions.5758 Empirical research demonstrates mock deposition effectiveness—emergency medicine residents showed statistically significant improvements in both knowledge scores (P < 0.01) and self-confidence ratings (P < 0.001) after simulated legal depositions, and witness preparation training increased testimony delivery skills and overall testimony quality.5960 Some experts benefit from mock depositions with outside professionals who can provide objective feedback.61

Review Publications: Anticipate that opposing counsel may question you about your published work, particularly if it contradicts positions you've taken in the case.60

Mental Preparation: Prepare mentally for the adversarial nature of the proceeding and practice maintaining composure under pressure.61

Question Types and Strategies

Understanding common question categories helps you prepare targeted responses and recognise opposing counsel's strategies:

Background and Credentials Questions

Opposing counsel typically begins by exploring your qualifications, looking for areas where your expertise may be insufficient for the opinions you've offered.6263

Strategy: Be honest about the limits of your expertise. Don't overstate qualifications or claim expertise beyond your actual experience.64 If your expertise doesn't fully cover certain aspects of the case, acknowledge this limitation rather than overreaching.

Document-Based Questions

Expect extensive questioning about documents you reviewed, relied upon, or created during your analysis.65

Strategy: Organise your documents carefully and be prepared to explain why you relied on certain materials while disregarding others.66 If you haven't reviewed a particular document, admit it rather than guessing.

Methodology Questions

Opposing counsel will challenge your analytical methods, looking for flaws or inconsistencies in your approach.67

Strategy: Be prepared to defend every aspect of your methodology with specific references to authoritative sources, industry standards, or established practices.68

Opinion Questions

These questions explore the boundaries and certainty of your opinions, often through hypothetical scenarios designed to expose weaknesses.69

Strategy: Stay within the bounds of your disclosed opinions and avoid expanding or modifying them during deposition.70 If asked about hypotheticals outside your analysis, clarify that you haven't analysed those scenarios.

Impeachment Attempts

Opposing counsel may use your prior testimony, publications, or statements to create apparent contradictions.71

Strategy: If confronted with prior statements, take time to review the context carefully before responding.72 If there's a genuine inconsistency, acknowledge it and explain the circumstances rather than denying the obvious.

How to Answer Effectively: 10 Golden Rules

These fundamental principles have been developed through decades of deposition experience and should guide every response you give:

1. Listen to the Entire Question

Never interrupt or begin answering before the question is complete.73 Compound questions or questions with multiple parts require careful analysis before responding.74 If you don't understand the question, ask for clarification.

2. Pause Before Answering

Take a moment to consider your response, even for simple questions.75 This pause allows you to formulate a precise answer and gives your counsel time to object if necessary.76

3. Answer Only What's Asked

Resist the urge to volunteer additional information or provide lengthy explanations.77 Every additional word is potential ammunition for opposing counsel.78 If more context is needed, your counsel can ask follow-up questions on redirect.

4. Be Concise

Use the minimum number of words necessary to answer the question accurately.79 Long, rambling answers create more opportunities for inconsistencies and follow-up attacks.

5. Tell the Truth

Never lie or knowingly provide false information.80 Under 18 U.S.C. § 1621, perjury—willfully stating material matters under oath that you do not believe to be true—carries federal criminal penalties of up to five years imprisonment, fines, or both.81 False testimony will also destroy your credibility if discovered.82 If the truth is harmful to your case, work with your counsel to minimize damage through preparation and context.

6. Don't Guess or Speculate

If you don't know the answer, say "I don't know."[82] If you're uncertain, say "I'm not certain" or "I don't recall."[83] Speculation and guessing open you to impeachment when the actual facts emerge.

7. Correct Mistakes Immediately

If you realize you've made an error, correct it as soon as possible.84 Attempting to cover up mistakes or hoping they won't be noticed inevitably backfires when opposing counsel discovers the error.

8. Stay Calm and Professional

Maintain your composure regardless of opposing counsel's tactics.85 Getting defensive, argumentative, or emotional damages your credibility and makes you appear biased rather than objective.86

9. Watch for Compound Questions

Compound questions combine multiple inquiries using "and" or "or."[87] Ask opposing counsel to break complex questions into separate parts so you can provide accurate answers to each component.88

10. Be Consistent with Your Report

Ensure your deposition testimony aligns with your written expert report.89 Significant deviations may lead to exclusion of your testimony or damage your credibility.90

Safe vs Unsafe Language: A Practical Guide

The words you choose during deposition can strengthen or undermine your testimony. This table provides guidance on language that projects competence and credibility versus language that creates problems:

Unsafe Language	Problem	Safe Alternative
"I'm absolutely certain" / "100% sure"	Creates impossible standard; any doubt becomes impeachment opportunity	"Based on my analysis, I believe..." / "In my professional opinion..."
"Always" / "Never"	Absolute statements easily contradicted by single exception	"Typically" / "In most cases" / "Generally"
"I assume" / "I guess"	Suggests speculation rather than analysis	"Based on the evidence I reviewed..." / "My analysis indicates..."
"Obviously" / "Clearly"	Dismissive; opposing counsel will challenge what's "obvious"	"The evidence shows..." / "My review indicates..."
"I haven't really thought about that"	Suggests inadequate preparation	"I have not specifically analysed that scenario" / "That was outside the scope of my engagement"
"That's what the lawyer told me to say"	Destroys independence and credibility	"My opinions are my own, based on my analysis of the evidence"
"Off the record..."	Nothing is off the record in a deposition	Simply don't say it
"I might be wrong, but..."	Undermines confidence in all opinions	State opinion, acknowledge limitations specifically if asked
"Everybody knows" / "It's common knowledge"	Invites challenge to prove the claim	"In my experience..." / "Standard industry practice is..."
"I don't remember what my report says"	Suggests you don't know your own work	"I'd like to refer to my report to ensure accuracy"

Language for Handling Difficult Situations

Situation	Unsafe Response	Safe Response
You don't know the answer	Guessing or speculating	"I don't know" / "I'm not certain" / "I would need to review [specific document] to answer accurately"
Question is unclear	Answering what you think was asked	"Could you please rephrase that question?" / "I want to make sure I understand—are you asking about...?"
Question is compound	Answering part of it	"That question has multiple parts. Could we address them separately?"
You made an error earlier	Hoping no one notices	"I need to correct something I said earlier. When I said X, I should have said Y"
Asked about matters outside your expertise	Stretching to answer	"That falls outside my area of expertise" / "I'm not qualified to opine on that"
Asked about documents you haven't reviewed	Guessing at contents	"I haven't reviewed that document" / "I'd need to review it before commenting"
Pressured to agree with leading statement	Agreeing to move on	"I cannot agree with that characterisation" / "That doesn't accurately reflect my opinion"
Asked hypothetical outside your analysis	Speculating on new scenarios	"I haven't analysed that hypothetical" / "My opinions are limited to the scenarios addressed in my report"

Common Deposition Pitfalls

Avoid these frequent mistakes that can damage your case and professional reputation:

Over-Claiming Expertise

The most dangerous mistake is claiming expertise beyond your actual qualifications.91 When expertise limitations are exposed during cross-examination, it destroys credibility for all your testimony, not just the overreach areas.92

Solution: Be honest about expertise boundaries and recommend additional experts when necessary rather than attempting to cover unfamiliar territory.

Arguing with Counsel

Getting into arguments with opposing counsel makes you appear biased and emotional rather than objective and professional.93

Solution: Answer questions directly without becoming defensive. Let your counsel handle objections and procedural disputes.

Volunteering Information

Offering information beyond what was requested provides opposing counsel with new avenues for attack.94

Solution: Answer the question asked, nothing more. If additional context is important, your counsel can elicit it during redirect examination.

Absolute Statements

Using words like "always," "never," or "100% certain" creates opportunities for impeachment if any exceptions exist.95

Solution: Use appropriately qualified language that reflects the true level of certainty in your opinions.

Sanitizing Files

Removing potentially damaging documents from your file before deposition production destroys your credibility if discovered.96

Solution: Maintain complete files and work with counsel to address problematic documents through preparation and context rather than concealment.

Getting Rattled by Pressure

Allowing opposing counsel's aggressive tactics to affect your composure and judgment leads to poor answers and missed opportunities to clarify important points.97

Solution: Practice maintaining calm under pressure through mock depositions and mental preparation exercises.

Technical Expert-Specific Considerations

Patent cases present unique challenges for technical experts that require specialised preparation:

Patent Claim Analysis Questions

Be prepared for detailed questioning about claim construction, element-by-element infringement analysis, and the basis for your claim interpretations.98

Preparation: Master the intrinsic evidence (patent specification, prosecution history, prior art) and be able to explain how persons of ordinary skill in the art would understand disputed terms.99

Source Code Review Questions

In software patent cases, expect extensive questioning about your source code analysis methodology, the specific code you examined, and your conclusions about functionality.100

Critical Issue: Ensure any source code you rely upon has been properly authenticated for admissibility.101 In Wi-LAN Inc. v. Sharp Electronics Corp., the Federal Circuit affirmed exclusion of source code printouts as inadmissible hearsay, rejecting business records and expert reliance theories, emphasizing that "Rule 703 does not authorize admitting inadmissible evidence on the pretense that it is the basis for expert opinion."[102] Proper authentication requires reliable chain of custody, contemporaneous creation records, and witness availability for cross-examination.103

Prior Art Analysis Questions

Be prepared to defend your prior art analysis, including why certain references were not anticipatory or why combinations wouldn't be obvious to persons of ordinary skill.103

Preparation: Understand the relevant technology field, the level of ordinary skill in the art at the relevant time period, and the motivations that would lead to combining prior art references.104

Technical Standards Questions

Many patent cases involve technical standards. Be prepared to explain how the accused products relate to relevant standards and whether standards compliance affects infringement analysis.105

Preparation: Obtain and study relevant technical standards, understand their development history, and be able to explain their relationship to the patents-in-suit.106

Role of Your Counsel

Understanding what your retaining counsel can and cannot do during depositions helps you prepare for the experience:

What Counsel Can Do

Preparation Support: Your counsel should provide comprehensive preparation sessions covering likely questions, case strategy, and legal standards.107

Objections: Counsel can object to improper questions, though most objections won't prevent you from answering during discovery depositions.108

Privilege Protection: Counsel will object to questions seeking privileged communications or attorney work product.109 Under Rule 26(b)(4)(C), communications between attorneys and testifying experts are protected work product except when they identify compensation, facts or data the attorney provided that the expert considered, or assumptions the attorney provided that the expert relied upon.110

Breaks: Counsel can request breaks for witness comfort or to address privilege issues, though opposing counsel may object to excessive or tactical delays.110

What Counsel Cannot Do

Answer for You: Counsel cannot answer questions on your behalf or coach your responses during the deposition.111

Unlimited Objections: While counsel can object, most objections during discovery depositions are noted for the record rather than preventing answers.112

Strategic Coaching: Counsel cannot provide strategic advice about how to answer specific questions once the deposition begins.113

Time Limits: Counsel cannot unilaterally limit deposition duration or scope beyond what's permitted by applicable rules and orders.114

After the Deposition

The deposition process continues even after questioning concludes:

Transcript Review Timeline

You have 30 days after receiving the transcript to review it for errors and submit an errata sheet.115 Missing this deadline waives your right to make corrections.116

What You Can Correct

Courts apply different standards for permissible errata sheet corrections:117

Traditional View: Some courts permit substantive changes to testimony, with changes subject to impeachment regarding credibility and reasons for alteration.118

Restrictive View: Many courts now limit corrections to typographical or transcription errors, prohibiting material alterations to testimony.119

Practical Reality: Courts increasingly strike errata sheets containing substantial changes, viewing them as improper attempts to alter sworn testimony. In a patent infringement case involving Chrysler Group, the court struck plaintiffs' errata sheets where they attempted to "clarify" testimony through language like "clarifying indefinite pronouns" and "harmonizing" answers—changes the court found materially altered the original testimony.120 The Sixth Circuit takes an especially restrictive approach, prohibiting material alterations and limiting Rule 30(e) to typographical or transcription errors only.121

Errata Sheet Best Practices

Document Real Errors: Only correct genuine transcription mistakes or typographical errors.121

Provide Clear Reasons: Explain specifically why each correction is necessary (e.g., "Court reporter transcribed 'patent' as 'parent'").122

Avoid Substantive Changes: Don't attempt to change answers from "no" to "yes" or add significant new information.123

Work with Counsel: Consult with your retaining counsel before submitting any errata sheet to ensure corrections are appropriate.124

Costs and Practical Realities

Understanding the financial dimensions of deposition preparation helps experts and retaining parties budget appropriately and make informed decisions about engagement scope.

Expert Witness Compensation

Expert witness fees for patent litigation vary significantly based on experience, specialisation, and case complexity:

Experience Level	US Hourly Rate	UK Equivalent (GBP)
Junior Expert (5-10 years)	$300-500/hour	£250-400/hour
Mid-Level Expert (10-20 years)	$500-800/hour	£400-650/hour
Senior Expert (20+ years)	$800-1,500/hour	£650-1,200/hour
Renowned Industry Expert	$1,500-3,000+/hour	£1,200-2,500+/hour

Deposition Day Rates: Many experts charge day rates for deposition attendance, typically ranging from $5,000-15,000 (US) or £4,000-12,000 (UK equivalent) for a full deposition day, plus preparation time.139

Total Preparation Costs

For a complex patent case, total expert deposition preparation costs typically include:

Activity	Estimated Hours	Cost Range (US)
Initial document review	20-40 hours	$10,000-40,000
Expert report preparation	40-80 hours	$20,000-80,000
Deposition preparation sessions	10-20 hours	$5,000-20,000
Mock deposition (if used)	4-8 hours	$2,000-8,000
Deposition attendance	4-8 hours	$2,000-12,000
Post-deposition review	2-4 hours	$1,000-4,000
Total Range	80-160 hours	$40,000-164,000

Payment Timing Best Practices

Critical Advice: Secure payment arrangements before, not after, your deposition.124 Attempting to collect fees after testimony can create credibility issues if opposing counsel suggests your opinions were influenced by payment concerns. Standard practice includes:

• Retainer deposit before work begins
• Regular billing (monthly or milestone-based)
• Full payment through deposition date before testimony
• Clear written engagement terms specifying scope and rates

Business Continuity Considerations

Deposition preparation represents a significant time commitment that can disrupt regular professional activities:

Time Away from Primary Work: A complex patent deposition may require 80-160 hours of preparation over 4-6 weeks, representing substantial opportunity cost for practising engineers, academics, or consultants.

Scheduling Flexibility: Depositions may be rescheduled or extended, requiring calendar flexibility. Build buffer time into professional commitments during the deposition window.

Travel Considerations: While remote depositions have become more common post-pandemic, some depositions still require travel. Ensure engagement terms address travel time, expenses, and cancellation policies.

UK Procedural Differences: Witness Statements vs Depositions

In UK patent litigation, the procedural framework differs substantially from US discovery depositions:

Witness Evidence in UK Courts:

• Expert evidence is primarily provided through written expert reports exchanged before trial140
• Cross-examination of experts occurs at trial, not through pre-trial depositions
• Experts have a duty to the court, not just to the instructing party
• The Civil Procedure Rules (CPR Part 35) govern expert evidence

Cost Implications:

• UK experts typically spend less time in adversarial questioning pre-trial
• However, trial preparation and cross-examination can be equally intensive
• UK litigation may involve costs management orders limiting recoverable expert fees
• IPEC (Intellectual Property Enterprise Court) has strict costs caps (currently £60,000 for liability stage, £30,000 for quantum) that affect expert budget allocation141

Insurance and Risk Management

Professional Liability Insurance: Ensure your professional liability insurance covers expert witness work. Some policies exclude or limit litigation support activities.

Engagement Documentation: Maintain clear written engagement terms that specify:

• Scope of work and deliverables
• Hourly rates and expense policies
• Intellectual property rights in work product
• Confidentiality obligations
• Limitation of liability provisions

Patent Deposition Preparation Checklist

Use this comprehensive timeline to ensure thorough preparation:

4-6 Weeks Before Deposition

• Schedule initial preparation meeting with retaining counsel
• Organise all case documents and create reference system
• Update and fact-check curriculum vitae
• Review expert report thoroughly, noting potential weak points
• Study patents-in-suit, prior art, and prosecution histories
• Secure payment arrangements (get paid before, not after deposition)

2-3 Weeks Before Deposition

• Review opposing expert reports and identify conflicts
• Study any prior deposition transcripts for patterns
• Review relevant publications and prior testimony
• Conduct initial mock deposition session
• Research background of opposing counsel and their typical strategies
• Prepare concise explanations of complex technical concepts

1 Week Before Deposition

• Final mock deposition with challenging questions
• Review 10 Golden Rules and common pitfalls
• Organise documents for easy access during deposition
• Confirm deposition logistics (time, place, remote access if applicable)
• Mental preparation and stress management exercises
• Final consultation with retaining counsel on case strategy

Day of Deposition

• Arrive early and review key materials one final time
• Bring necessary documents and organised file
• Remember: Listen carefully, pause before answering, be concise
• Stay professional regardless of opposing counsel's tactics
• Take breaks as needed to maintain focus and composure

After Deposition

• Schedule debriefing with retaining counsel
• Calendar transcript review deadline (30 days)
• Review transcript carefully when received
• Prepare appropriate errata sheet if needed
• Document lessons learned for future depositions

Conclusion

Effective patent deposition preparation transforms a potentially destructive proceeding into a manageable professional challenge. By understanding the process, preparing thoroughly, following the 10 Golden Rules, and avoiding common pitfalls, you can deliver testimony that strengthens your case rather than undermines it.

Remember that depositions are high-stakes, adversarial proceedings that require serious preparation. The 4-6 week preparation timeline isn't excessive—it's necessary for success in complex patent litigation. Your professional reputation, case outcomes, and future opportunities all depend on your deposition performance.

Most importantly, work closely with your retaining counsel throughout the preparation process. While this guide provides comprehensive frameworks and strategies, every case is unique, and your attorney's guidance on case-specific issues is essential for optimal results.

Disclaimer: This article provides general guidance on patent deposition preparation. Always follow the specific advice of your retaining counsel, as each case presents unique circumstances and legal requirements that may affect deposition strategy and preparation.

---

Sources

[1] Expert Institute. "Best Practices For Preparing Expert Depositions." https://www.expertinstitute.com/resources/insights/best-practices-for-preparing-expert-depositions/

[2] SEAK. "The 10 Biggest Mistakes Expert Witnesses Make During Depositions." https://seak.com/the-10-biggest-mistakes-expert-witnesses-make-during-depositions/

[3] SEAK. "How to Prepare Your Expert Witness for Deposition." https://blog.seakexperts.com/prepare-expert-witness-deposition/

[4] How are Patent Cases Resolved? An Empirical Examination of the Adjudication and Settlement of Patent Disputes." SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=916365

[5] Courtroom Sciences. "Using Deposition Testimony to Enhance Settlement Negotiations." https://bluenotary.us/leveraging-deposition-testimony-for-successful-settlement-negotiations/

[6] Expert Institute. "Attorney beliefs concerning scientific evidence and expert witness credibility." Science Direct. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160252715000473

[7] SEAK. "How to Prepare Your Expert Witness for Deposition." https://blog.seakexperts.com/prepare-expert-witness-deposition/

[8] Expert Institute. "6 Expert Witness Mistakes to Avoid." https://www.expertinstitute.com/resources/insights/expert-witness-mistakes-avoid/

[7] Cornell Law School. "Rule 30. Depositions by Oral Examination." https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_30

[8] Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. "Rule 30 - Depositions by Oral Examination, Fed. R. Civ. P. 30." https://casetext.com/statute/united-states-code/title-28-appendix/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure/title-v-disclosures-and-discovery/rule-30-depositions-by-oral-examination

[9] FederalRulesofCivilProcedure.org. "Rule 30 - Depositions by Oral Examination | 2024 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure." https://www.federalrulesofcivilprocedure.org/frcp/title-v-disclosures-and-discovery/rule-30-depositions-by-oral-examination/

[10] Reuters. "Deposing an Expert (Federal)." https://www.reuters.com/practical-law-the-journal/litigation/deposing-an-expert-federal-2024-01-01/

[11] ForensisGroup. "Expert Deposition Preparation: A Comprehensive 2025 Guide for Legal Success." https://www.forensisgroup.com/resources/expert-legal-witness-blog/expert-deposition-a-preparation-guideline

[12] Expert Institute. "Best Practices For Preparing Expert Depositions." https://www.expertinstitute.com/resources/insights/best-practices-for-preparing-expert-depositions/

[13] Federal Judicial Center. "Durational Limits on Depositions." https://fjc.gov/content/304407/durational-limits-depositions

[14] Cornell Law School. "Rule 30. Depositions by Oral Examination." https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_30

[15] Advocate Magazine. "Preparing your retained-expert witness for deposition." https://www.advocatemagazine.com/article/2017-october/preparing-your-retained-expert-witness-for-deposition

[16] ScienceDirect. "Information and settlement: Empirical evidence on Daubert rulings and settlement rates." https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0144818817300042

[17] NITA. "Expert Testimony: A Guide for Expert Witnesses and the Lawyers Who Examine Them." https://www.nita.org/s/product/expert-testimony-a-guide-for-expert-witnesses-and-the-lawyers-who-examine-them-fourth-edition-epub/01t4W00000DAO0AQAX

[18] TestifyingTraining. "The Most Common Mistakes Expert Witnesses Make at Deposition." https://www.testifyingtraining.com/the-most-common-mistakes-expert-witnesses-make-at-deposition/

[19] Finnegan. "Using an Expert at a Markman Hearing: Practical and Tactical Considerations." https://www.finnegan.com/en/insights/articles/using-an-expert-at-a-markman-hearing-practical-and-tactical.html

[20] Patent Law US. "Patent Law Expert Declarations & Deposition | Intellectual Property." https://www.patentlaw.us/tech-expert-declarations-depositions/

[21] Lexis Advance. "Experts in Patent Litigation: Use of Experts During Litigation and Expert Discovery." https://advance.lexis.com/open/document/openwebdocview/Experts-in-Patent-Litigation-Use-of-Experts-During-Litigation-and-Expert-Discovery/

[22] BlueNotary. "Using Deposition Testimony to Enhance Settlement Negotiations." https://bluenotary.us/leveraging-deposition-testimony-for-successful-settlement-negotiations/

[23] Courtroom Sciences. "5 Common Litigation Consulting Misconceptions." https://www.courtroomsciences.com/litigation-consulting-1/5-common-litigation-consulting-misconceptions-627/

[24] Missouri Law Review. "Valuation of Cases for Settlement: Theory and Practice." https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/context/jdr/article/1210/viewcontent/1991JDispResol1_281991_29.pdf

[25] Cornell Law School. "Rule 30. Depositions by Oral Examination." https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_30

[26] Expert Institute. "6 Expert Witness Mistakes to Avoid." https://www.expertinstitute.com/resources/insights/expert-witness-mistakes-avoid/

[27] SEAK. "How to Prepare Your Expert Witness for Deposition." https://blog.seakexperts.com/prepare-expert-witness-deposition/

[28] Expert Institute. "6 Expert Witness Mistakes to Avoid." https://www.expertinstitute.com/resources/insights/expert-witness-mistakes-avoid/

[29] TestifyingTraining. "How an Expert Witness Should Prepare for Deposition." https://www.testifyingtraining.com/expert-witness-prepare-deposition/

[30] Cornell Law School. "Rule 30. Depositions by Oral Examination." https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_30

[31] Expert Institute. "Best Practices For Preparing Expert Depositions." https://www.expertinstitute.com/resources/insights/best-practices-for-preparing-expert-depositions/

[32] Westlaw. "Depositions: Deposing an Expert Checklist | Practical Law." https://content.next.westlaw.com/practical-law/document/Ie2ad52cd7fe711e498db8b09b4f043e0/Depositions-Deposing-an-Expert-Checklist

[33] Expert Institute. "Best Practices For Preparing Expert Depositions." https://www.expertinstitute.com/resources/insights/best-practices-for-preparing-expert-depositions/

[34] Advocate Magazine. "Preparing your retained-expert witness for deposition." https://www.advocatemagazine.com/article/2017-october/preparing-your-retained-expert-witness-for-deposition

[35] Cornell Law School. "Rule 30. Depositions by Oral Examination." https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_30

[36] Expert Institute. "Best Practices For Preparing Expert Depositions." https://www.expertinstitute.com/resources/insights/best-practices-for-preparing-expert-depositions/

[37] Reuters. "Deposing an Expert (Federal)." https://www.reuters.com/practical-law-the-journal/litigation/deposing-an-expert-federal-2024-01-01/

[38] SEAK. "The 10 Biggest Mistakes Expert Witnesses Make During Depositions." https://seak.com/the-10-biggest-mistakes-expert-witnesses-make-during-depositions/

[39] TestifyingTraining. "How an Expert Witness Should Prepare for Deposition." https://www.testifyingtraining.com/expert-witness-prepare-deposition/

[40] Cornell Law School. "Rule 30. Depositions by Oral Examination." https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_30

[41] Cornell Law School. "Rule 30. Depositions by Oral Examination." https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_30

[42] Patent Law JMBM. "Court Strikes Errata Sheets to Depositions Where 'Clarifications' Materially Altered Testimony." https://patentlaw.jmbm.com/2014/06/court-strikes-errata-sheets-to.html

[43] Lexology. "To What Extent Can You Use Errata Sheets To Correct Testimony Under Rule 30(e)?" https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=a46a6e9b-1196-48c7-be5d-d81b80ce63ef

[44] Cornell Law School. "Rule 30. Depositions by Oral Examination." https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_30

[45] Expert Institute. "6 Expert Witness Mistakes to Avoid." https://www.expertinstitute.com/resources/insights/expert-witness-mistakes-avoid/

[46] Expert Institute. "Best Practices For Preparing Expert Depositions." https://www.expertinstitute.com/resources/insights/best-practices-for-preparing-expert-depositions/

[47] ForensisGroup. "Expert Deposition Preparation: A Comprehensive 2025 Guide for Legal Success." https://www.forensisgroup.com/resources/expert-legal-witness-blog/expert-deposition-a-preparation-guideline

[48] ForensisGroup. "Expert Deposition Preparation: A Comprehensive 2025 Guide for Legal Success." https://www.forensisgroup.com/resources/expert-legal-witness-blog/expert-deposition-a-preparation-guideline

[49] TestifyingTraining. "How an Expert Witness Should Prepare for Deposition." https://www.testifyingtraining.com/expert-witness-prepare-deposition/

[50] ForensisGroup. "Expert Deposition Preparation: A Comprehensive 2025 Guide for Legal Success." https://www.forensisgroup.com/resources/expert-legal-witness-blog/expert-deposition-a-preparation-guideline

[51] Finnegan. "Using an Expert at a Markman Hearing: Practical and Tactical Considerations." https://www.finnegan.com/en/insights/articles/using-an-expert-at-a-markman-hearing-practical-and-tactical.html

[52] ExpertPages. "How to Prepare an Expert Witness for a Deposition." https://www.expertpages.com/library/how-to-prepare-an-expert-witness-for-a-deposition

[53] SEAK. "How to Prepare Your Expert Witness for Deposition." https://blog.seakexperts.com/prepare-expert-witness-deposition/

[54] ExpertPages. "How to Prepare an Expert Witness for a Deposition." https://www.expertpages.com/library/how-to-prepare-an-expert-witness-for-a-deposition

[55] TestifyingTraining. "How an Expert Witness Should Prepare for Deposition." https://www.testifyingtraining.com/expert-witness-prepare-deposition/

[56] SEAK. "The 10 Biggest Mistakes Expert Witnesses Make During Depositions." https://seak.com/the-10-biggest-mistakes-expert-witnesses-make-during-depositions/

[57] Mock Deposition. "Expert Witness Preparation - Mock Deposition." https://www.mockdeposition.com/expert-witness-preparation/

[58] San Diego County Bar Association. "An Expert Witness' Perspective on Depositions." https://www.sdcba.org/?pg=FTR-Mar-2020-2

[59] Mock Deposition. "Expert Witness Preparation - Mock Deposition." https://www.mockdeposition.com/expert-witness-preparation/

[60] ExpertPages. "How to Prepare an Expert Witness for a Deposition." https://www.expertpages.com/library/how-to-prepare-an-expert-witness-for-a-deposition

[61] TestifyingTraining. "How an Expert Witness Should Prepare for Deposition." https://www.testifyingtraining.com/expert-witness-prepare-deposition/

[62] Expert Institute. "Best Practices For Preparing Expert Depositions." https://www.expertinstitute.com/resources/insights/best-practices-for-preparing-expert-depositions/

[63] NIJ. "Law 101: Legal Guide for the Forensic Expert | Exercising Caution About Opinions, Omissions and Responses at Deposition." https://nij.ojp.gov/nij-hosted-online-training-courses/law-101-legal-guide-forensic-expert/depositions/exercising-caution-about-opinions-omissions-and-responses-deposition

[64] NIJ. "Law 101: Legal Guide for the Forensic Expert | Exercising Caution About Opinions, Omissions and Responses at Deposition." https://nij.ojp.gov/nij-hosted-online-training-courses/law-101-legal-guide-forensic-expert/depositions/exercising-caution-about-opinions-omissions-and-responses-deposition

[65] Expert Institute. "Best Practices For Preparing Expert Depositions." https://www.expertinstitute.com/resources/insights/best-practices-for-preparing-expert-depositions/

[66] TestifyingTraining. "How an Expert Witness Should Prepare for Deposition." https://www.testifyingtraining.com/expert-witness-prepare-deposition/

[67] Reuters. "Deposing an Expert (Federal)." https://www.reuters.com/practical-law-the-journal/litigation/deposing-an-expert-federal-2024-01-01/

[68] ForensisGroup. "Expert Deposition Preparation: A Comprehensive 2025 Guide for Legal Success." https://www.forensisgroup.com/resources/expert-legal-witness-blog/expert-deposition-a-preparation-guideline

[69] Westlaw. "8-71. Hypothetical questions and examples." https://content.next.westlaw.com/practical-law/document/I07ee0cfbc85f11d9b9c0da52078231f3/8-71-Hypothetical-questions-and-examples

[70] Reuters. "Deposing an Expert (Federal)." https://www.reuters.com/practical-law-the-journal/litigation/deposing-an-expert-federal-2024-01-01/

[71] Expert Institute. "6 Expert Witness Mistakes to Avoid." https://www.expertinstitute.com/resources/insights/expert-witness-mistakes-avoid/

[72] TestifyingTraining. "How an Expert Witness Should Prepare for Deposition." https://www.testifyingtraining.com/expert-witness-prepare-deposition/

[73] TestifyingTraining. "The Most Common Mistakes Expert Witnesses Make at Deposition." https://www.testifyingtraining.com/the-most-common-mistakes-expert-witnesses-make-at-deposition/

[74] California Lawyers Association. "Should You Object to Compound Questions?" https://calawyers.org/solo-small-firm/should-you-object-to-compound-questions/

[75] SEAK. "How to Prepare Your Expert Witness for Deposition." https://blog.seakexperts.com/prepare-expert-witness-deposition/

[76] Expert Institute. "The Ultimate Expert Witness Objection Checklist." https://www.expertinstitute.com/resources/insights/the-ultimate-expert-witness-objection-checklist/

[77] SEAK. "The 10 Biggest Mistakes Expert Witnesses Make During Depositions." https://seak.com/the-10-biggest-mistakes-expert-witnesses-make-during-depositions/

[78] SEAK. "The 10 Biggest Mistakes Expert Witnesses Make During Depositions." https://seak.com/the-10-biggest-mistakes-expert-witnesses-make-during-depositions/

[79] Expert Institute. "Establishing Credibility: Words and Phrases to Avoid as an Expert Witness." https://www.expertinstitute.com/resources/insights/establishing-credibility-words-and-phrases-to-avoid-as-an-expert-witness/

[80] TestifyingTraining. "How an Expert Witness Should Prepare for Deposition." https://www.testifyingtraining.com/expert-witness-prepare-deposition/

[81] Cornell Law School. "Rule 30. Depositions by Oral Examination." https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_30

[82] TestifyingTraining. "The Most Common Mistakes Expert Witnesses Make at Deposition." https://www.testifyingtraining.com/the-most-common-mistakes-expert-witnesses-make-at-deposition/

[83] SEAK. "How to Prepare Your Expert Witness for Deposition." https://blog.seakexperts.com/prepare-expert-witness-deposition/

[84] SEAK. "The 10 Biggest Mistakes Expert Witnesses Make During Depositions." https://seak.com/the-10-biggest-mistakes-expert-witnesses-make-during-depositions/

[85] TestifyingTraining. "The Most Common Mistakes Expert Witnesses Make at Deposition." https://www.testifyingtraining.com/the-most-common-mistakes-expert-witnesses-make-at-deposition/

[86] Expert Institute. "6 Expert Witness Mistakes to Avoid." https://www.expertinstitute.com/resources/insights/expert-witness-mistakes-avoid/

[87] Cornell Law School. "compound question." https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/compound_question

[88] California Lawyers Association. "Should You Object to Compound Questions?" https://calawyers.org/solo-small-firm/should-you-object-to-compound-questions/

[89] ForensisGroup. "Expert Deposition Preparation: A Comprehensive 2025 Guide for Legal Success." https://www.forensisgroup.com/resources/expert-legal-witness-blog/expert-deposition-a-preparation-guideline

[90] ForensisGroup. "Expert Deposition Preparation: A Comprehensive 2025 Guide for Legal Success." https://www.forensisgroup.com/resources/expert-legal-witness-blog/expert-deposition-a-preparation-guideline

[91] NIJ. "Law 101: Legal Guide for the Forensic Expert | Exercising Caution About Opinions, Omissions and Responses at Deposition." https://nij.ojp.gov/nij-hosted-online-training-courses/law-101-legal-guide-forensic-expert/depositions/exercising-caution-about-opinions-omissions-and-responses-deposition

[92] Expert Institute. "6 Expert Witness Mistakes to Avoid." https://www.expertinstitute.com/resources/insights/expert-witness-mistakes-avoid/

[93] Expert Institute. "6 Expert Witness Mistakes to Avoid." https://www.expertinstitute.com/resources/insights/expert-witness-mistakes-avoid/

[94] TestifyingTraining. "The Most Common Mistakes Expert Witnesses Make at Deposition." https://www.testifyingtraining.com/the-most-common-mistakes-expert-witnesses-make-at-deposition/

[95] Expert Institute. "Establishing Credibility: Words and Phrases to Avoid as an Expert Witness." https://www.expertinstitute.com/resources/insights/establishing-credibility-words-and-phrases-to-avoid-as-an-expert-witness/

[96] SEAK. "The 10 Biggest Mistakes Expert Witnesses Make During Depositions." https://seak.com/the-10-biggest-mistakes-expert-witnesses-make-during-depositions/

[97] TestifyingTraining. "How an Expert Witness Should Prepare for Deposition." https://www.testifyingtraining.com/expert-witness-prepare-deposition/

[98] Patent Law US. "Patent Law Expert Declarations & Deposition | Intellectual Property." https://www.patentlaw.us/tech-expert-declarations-depositions/

[99] Finnegan. "Using an Expert at a Markman Hearing: Practical and Tactical Considerations." https://www.finnegan.com/en/insights/articles/using-an-expert-at-a-markman-hearing-practical-and-tactical.html

[100] Software Litigation Consulting. "Source code ch.27: Expert reports." https://www.softwarelitigationconsulting.com/source-code-book/source-code-ch-27-expert-reports/

[101] Knobbe Martens. "Hurdles in the Admissibility of Source Code and Expert Reliance on Unauthenticated Source Code." https://www.knobbe.com/blog/hurdles-admissibility-source-code-and-expert-reliance-unauthenticated-source-code/

[102] Mondaq. "Fed Circuit Affirms Exclusion Of Source Code Containing Hearsay." https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/patent/1076922/fed-circuit-affirms-exclusion-of-source-code-containing-hearsay

[103] Lexis Advance. "Experts in Patent Litigation: Use of Experts During Litigation and Expert Discovery." https://advance.lexis.com/open/document/openwebdocview/Experts-in-Patent-Litigation-Use-of-Experts-During-Litigation-and-Expert-Discovery/

[104] Patent Law US. "Patent Law Expert Declarations & Deposition | Intellectual Property." https://www.patentlaw.us/tech-expert-declarations-depositions/

[105] Software Litigation Consulting. "Source code ch.27: Expert reports." https://www.softwarelitigationconsulting.com/source-code-book/source-code-ch-27-expert-reports/

[106] Barrgroup. "Source Code Review Services." https://barrgroup.com/software-expert-witness/litigation-services/code-reviews

[107] Advocate Magazine. "Preparing your retained-expert witness for deposition." https://www.advocatemagazine.com/article/2017-october/preparing-your-retained-expert-witness-for-deposition

[108] Expert Institute. "The Ultimate Expert Witness Objection Checklist." https://www.expertinstitute.com/resources/insights/the-ultimate-expert-witness-objection-checklist/

[109] Expert Institute. "The Ultimate Expert Witness Objection Checklist." https://www.expertinstitute.com/resources/insights/the-ultimate-expert-witness-objection-checklist/

[110] TestifyingTraining. "How an Expert Witness Should Prepare for Deposition." https://www.testifyingtraining.com/expert-witness-prepare-deposition/

[111] Westlaw. "Depositions: Practical Tips for Working with a Testifying Expert (Federal) | Practical Law." https://content.next.westlaw.com/practical-law/document/Ic9c2563518e211e698dc8b09b4f043e0/Depositions-Practical-Tips-for-Working-with-a-Testifying-Expert-Federal

[112] RocketMatter. "The Ultimate Deposition Objections Cheat Sheet for Lawyers." https://rocketmatter.com/blog/deposition-objections-cheat-sheet

[113] Expert Institute. "The Ultimate Expert Witness Objection Checklist." https://www.expertinstitute.com/resources/insights/the-ultimate-expert-witness-objection-checklist/

[114] Cornell Law School. "Rule 30. Depositions by Oral Examination." https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_30

[115] Cornell Law School. "Rule 30. Depositions by Oral Examination." https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_30

[116] SEAK. "The 10 Biggest Mistakes Expert Witnesses Make During Depositions." https://seak.com/the-10-biggest-mistakes-expert-witnesses-make-during-depositions/

[117] American Bar Association. "Pretrial Discovery Strategies: Defending Against a Deponent's Errata Sheet Before, During, and After a Deposition." https://www.americanbar.org/groups/litigation/resources/newsletters/commercial-business/deposition-errata-sheet/

[118] Patent Law JMBM. "Court Strikes Errata Sheets to Depositions Where 'Clarifications' Materially Altered Testimony." https://patentlaw.jmbm.com/2014/06/court-strikes-errata-sheets-to.html

[119] Lexology. "To What Extent Can You Use Errata Sheets To Correct Testimony Under Rule 30(e)?" https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=a46a6e9b-1196-48c7-be5d-d81b80ce63ef

[120] Patent Law JMBM. "Motion to Strike Errata Sheets." https://patentlaw.jmbm.com/2014/11/motion-to-strike-errata-sheets.html

[121] American Bar Association. "Pretrial Discovery Strategies: Defending Against a Deponent's Errata Sheet Before, During, and After a Deposition." https://www.americanbar.org/groups/litigation/resources/newsletters/commercial-business/deposition-errata-sheet/

[122] American Bar Association. "Pretrial Discovery Strategies: Defending Against a Deponent's Errata Sheet Before, During, and After a Deposition." https://www.americanbar.org/groups/litigation/resources/newsletters/commercial-business/deposition-errata-sheet/

[123] Patent Law JMBM. "Court Strikes Errata Sheets to Depositions Where 'Clarifications' Materially Altered Testimony." https://patentlaw.jmbm.com/2014/06/court-strikes-errata-sheets-to.html

[124] TestifyingTraining. "SEAK Expert Witness Deposition Preparation Checklist - Expert Witnesses Training - SEAK, Inc." https://www.testifyingtraining.com/seak-expert-witness-deposition-preparation-checklist/

[125] Northern District of Oklahoma. "LCvR30 – Depositions by Oral Examination." https://oknd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/madcap/content/lcvr30.htm

[126] Expert Institute. "Rule 26, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: A Disclosure Guide for Expert Witnesses." https://www.expertinstitute.com/resources/insights/rule-26-federal-rules-of-civil-procedure-a-disclosure-guide-for-expert-witnesses/

[127] Expert Institute. "Preparing Your Expert Witness for Trial: A Checklist." https://www.expertinstitute.com/resources/insights/preparing-expert-witness-trial-testimony/

[128] "Informal Deference: A Historical, Empirical, and Normative Analysis of Patent Claim Construction." SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2150360

[129] "Information and settlement: Empirical evidence on Daubert rulings and settlement rates." Science Direct. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0144818817300042

[130] "The Stricter Standard: An Empirical Assessment of Daubert's Effect on Civil Defendants." SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2295003

[131] "Method of preparing emergency medicine residents for giving legal depositions." De Gruyter. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.7556/jaoa.1999.99.1.28/html

[132] "Witness preparation training with real and simulated criminal defendants." PubMed. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16170790/

[133] Mock Deposition. "Expert Witness Preparation - Mock Deposition." https://www.mockdeposition.com/expert-witness-preparation/

[134] Cornell Law School. "18 U.S. Code § 1621 - Perjury generally." https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1621

[135] JD Supra. "Federal Circuit Affirms Refusal to Admit Source Code Printouts Obtained from Third Parties." https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/federal-circuit-affirms-refusal-to-3833197/

[136] Knobbe Martens. "Hurdles in the Admissibility of Source Code and Expert Reliance on Unauthenticated Source Code." https://www.knobbe.com/blog/hurdles-admissibility-source-code-and-expert-reliance-unauthenticated-source-code/

[137] Lexology. "Court strikes errata sheets to depositions where 'clarifications' materially altered testimony." https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=71bcdaca-5be5-456c-9595-b707ce6dcf53

[138] Florida State University Law Review. "Work Product Privilege and Discovery of Expert Testimony: Resolving the Conflict between Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(b)(3) and 26(b)(4)." https://ir.law.fsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2314&context=lr

[139] AIPLA. "2023 Report of the Economic Survey." https://www.aipla.org/detail/journal-issue/2023-report-of-the-economic-survey (Expert witness compensation data for patent litigation)

[140] UK Civil Procedure Rules. "Part 35 - Experts and Assessors." https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part35 (Governing rules for expert evidence in England and Wales)

[141] UK Intellectual Property Enterprise Court. "Guide to the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court Small Claims Track and Multi-Track." https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/intellectual-property-enterprise-court-guide (IPEC costs caps and procedures)